At the opposite end of the eyes the world: Equal? The "technological convergence" Jürgen Habermas is changing in a noisy explanatory schemes had become dogma for science in human knowledge, speaks of breaking the boundaries and how it is coming to an era that transdisciplinarity is more entrenched and takes more strength every day. disciplines not only in crisis, humanity itself is in a crisis, then the change common places, languages \u200b\u200band communication channels are fragmented, people who do not have access to new technologies are the new poor therefore, the rejected in the new information society. Habermas himself, being of the Frankfurt School and thus opponent of the Mass Communication Research explains communication as a "Dialogue among individuals who are seen as equally capable of language and therefore to communicate to find the understanding through argumentation., [1] also promotes equality for all people by their Marxist, but the reality is very different and as time passes gaps are wider among those who have access to technologies information and those that do not. Internet is a global access and can bring something like a butterfly effect when information is shared universally. This has changed the conception of culture and helped to make globalization more The problem is the monopoly of ideas and cultures. This is Maria Isabel says Riviere, who in turn quoted Coello and Sollis says: [...] "The global connectivity is not real, optical fiber cables that connect high-speed computers to maintain a geographical distribution Specifically, linking certain key nodes with child nodes that connect to networks of lesser importance that circulate as much information. media allow the dissemination of ideas, models and cultural values \u200b\u200boriginating in the main nodes, located mainly in the United States and the European Union, and extending through distributive nodes, and these servers are connected to global infrastructure by concentrating several companies. (Solis, Coello, 2002). " The advances in technology are beneficial to the world. But there are marginal areas do not have that technology and which will become part of the stragglers, some of the uneducated mass and illiterate not by choice but because the circumstances have led to belong to it. Another debatable point is the creation identity, manipulation, the abolition of time and space, proxemics mediation. Men lose their characteristics of being social, to adapt to living fused to a machine that provides everything except the food. McLuhan spoke of the media as extensions of man, but never talk about that man lost all ability to interact with peers but had a means to mediate, despite the redundancy, including García Canclini also considers the fragmentation social, said that the processes taking place at this time, "become more complex territorial asymmetry" then referring to the people have different cultures that are complex, but inserting these cultures into the information age will be much more complex. In conclusion I think it is imminent that this convergence occurs. The experience of talking to the younger population, but the inclusion of all human beings should not be an option but an obligation and responsibility of each one of us and government. The democratization of information, acculturation in political and academic may bring Tolerance and Equality, which promoted both that do not suffer from rejection and are not the opposite end of the world's eyes. -> -> LIVE, Maria Elena "The communicative conception of Jürgen Habermas," Labour party "Public Opinion and Communication in Habermas and Sartori" (Unpublished document). -> -> Riviere, Isabel Maria, 2006, The new cultural forms of communication and information and its regional impact in Argentina, Journal of the TEXT = "" cyber ="">, 9. Varied themes. Available in http://www.cibersociedad.net
0 comments:
Post a Comment